Search on SLJ.com ....
Subscribe to SLJ
Teen Librarian Toolbox
Inside Teen Librarian Toolbox

Movie Discussion: Beautiful Creatures

36f06 beautifulcreatures Movie Discussion: Beautiful Creatures

So now, it’s been a whole week since Beautiful Creatures has come out to the big screen, and we here at Teen Librarian Toolbox have been very patient with you readers in waiting for you to see it.  If you haven’t, then go see it, and then come back, because after the break, we’re going to be discussing the movie and what we liked and didn’t like about it.

If you haven’t read the book by Kami Garcia and Margaret Stohl, then chances are you will love the movie and not have really any qualms.  Beautiful Creatures is not doing too well in the box office, possibly for a number of reasons.  Talk around online outlets seem to say that the trailers made it out to be the next Sparkly Vampire Movie, when the movie wasn’t about that at all.  The books also supposedly don’t have as great a readership as those Sparkly Vampire Movie books,  which may have hurt chances as well.  It also was released during the weekend that Die Hard and Safe Haven were released, and Warm Bodies was still out, splitting up the potential audience.  

I don’t know.  Karen and I took her Tween to see it on Saturday, and we both loved it.  Karen hasn’t read the books, I have, and I divorced myself from the series in order to stay in movie world and fall in love with the movie.  If you’ve read the books, this is one of the movies that you’ll need to stay strictly in movie world in order to enjoy.  While Garcia and Stohl gave their blessing on the changes and rewrites, there are huge changes to the story.  CinemaBlend does a really good job of hitting the highlights here.  I do have to wonder if the changes that they made are because they’re not going to make a franchise- I haven’t been able to find anything online about any sequels, even before the weekend takes were online, which is unusual when there are multiple books you can take for subject matter. 

NOW, HERE IS THE BREAK.  DO NOT CLICK FURTHER UNLESS YOU WANT SPOILERS!


I don’t have my copy of Beautiful Creatures in front of me- our library’s copy is out with about 7 holds on it (yea), but I can tell you what I really liked from the movie and what I really missed from the book.

WHAT I REALLY LIKED FROM THE MOVIE
Seeing Serafine earlier:  Emma Thompson would have been wasted playing Mrs. Lincoln the way she had been written in the book, and seeing her being Serafine much earlier in the script was wonderful.  She got to be the evil and crazy, the ultragood and the mysterious all at once.  I wish she had more screen time.

  Ridley:  I loved how they played Ridley in the movie and the books, and I wish that she had more lines.  Maybe there are extended versions coming in the DVD.  Even though she’s a red-head polished Southern belle, and not the blonde over-the-top anime version from the books, Emmy Rossum nails Ridley like she was in my head.

Magic vs Religion: I really liked how the whole movie treated magic and religion on the Caster and Amma’s view- about how it’s all created by one and the same, and it’s only man who tells you what’s bad and what’s not.  I think it’s a very important viewpoint, not only for magic but for tolerance within our own culture, and one that’s lost.

The Magic:  I really liked how they did the magic- the house, Lena’s writing on the rooms, the snow in South Carolina, Serafine coming through, the fight between Lena and Ridley, the glowing eyes…  it could have come off as really cheesy but it came out really wonderful and special instead.

WHAT I REALLY MISSED FROM THE BOOK
Amma:  I missed the original Amma.  I missed her cooking in the house, with her talismans and crossword puzzles, and the total immersion into her religion.  This is one of the things that makes me think there may not be more sequels coming- if you’ve read the books, you realize what an important part Amma and her religion and powers play, and how they counterbalance Macon, and we just tiptoe into the kiddie pool with it.

The Kelting and the Song:  Not only do Ethan and Lena not talk to each other mind-to-mind (Kelting), there’s no song telling Ethan and Lena what to do.  If you read the books, the song is such an important part of the plots for *each* of the books, and in the fourth you find out where they were coming from, and to have it taken out completely leaves something to be desired to me.  Not as bad as the deleted scene with Harry and Dudley in the last Potter movie, but still there.

Genevieve and the Book of Moons:  They changed up the whole story about Genevieve and the Book of Moons, and I’m not sure if it’s for better or worse.  Karen will tell you that she couldn’t get through the book for the flashback scenes, but the ties between Genevieve and her Ethan and Lena and the current Ethan are huge in the series.  The fact that the Book was in the library, not in the grave changes things completely.

More Story/Explanation:  It probably doesn’t make any sense to anyone but me, but I wanted more explanation on how things worked.  They never explained how Ethan could break through the protection spells they had worked around Lena; I know because I read the book.  They never explained how even though Serafine couldn’t break through Ethan’s house, Ridley could get into the mansion; I know because I read the book.  They never explained why Ridley was eating everything in sight while doing magic; I know because I read the book.  I wanted to know more about the world- we got mostly surface, and I like to know deeper.

Karen’s POV:
I tried reading the first book when it came out, I really did.  But I didn’t finish (shhh, don’t tell). It just took a really long time it seemed to go anywhere.  But when they started airing the ads on tv my Tween began begging me to take her.  Since this was the first non-animated movie she has ever asked to see, and it is ya lit inspired, and I wanted to see it anyway – we went.  I LOVED the movie.  I would go see it again in the theater to be honest.  Yes, it is a teen movie.  There is romance, there is angst. I loved Emma Thompson’s performance, even if it was over the top.  I loved the way they talked about books and reading and banned books and the desire to escape the small town.  In fact, they capture small town life perfectly.  All in all, I found it to be perfectly entertaining, I liked the message of taking control of your own destiny, and I found the lead characters to be charming and endearing and I wanted them to triumph.  That, in my book, makes a movie successful. Another bonus, it introduced me to Charles Bukowski whom I had never heard of.  Check out some of his quotes here.

Have you seen the movie?  Read the book?  Share your thoughts in the comments!

Comments

  1. Seriously, I thought Alden Ehrenreich was IT. I laughed til I cried. I cried til I laughed. I don't think the movie would have been as tolerable with a poor Ethan and he was the best Ethan I could imagine.

    I loved Jeremy Irons (if I had a few million dollars I would hire him to play the piano for me when I'm sad) and Emma Thompson looked like she was just. going. berserk. I loved it. I take issue with the people who say Alice Englert isn't pretty enough. I think she's pretty cute and I prefer a Lena who's a bit odd-looking. If she had been some perfect swan I would have left the theater pretty early.

    I agree with a lot of what you said, Christie, and I'm definitely going to buy it on dvd. I already signed up for notification when it becomes available for pre-order.

  2. Christie says:

    I *LOVED* crazy Emma Thompson! That was the WHOLE POINT and people miss it- she TOOK OVER Link's MOM, not that she WAS Link's Mom. HELLO!!!! *bangs head on desk* And I worship Jeremy Irons.

    And can I say how excited I am that (knock on wood) this SHOULD BE a book based movie I can show in the library! As opposed to those done by Summit (Perks, Warm Bodies) which require one-time licenses which I can't afford…

    8-D

Speak Your Mind

*